data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4c52/b4c52c6b78a97016041ae2ae4259255dc01fbf07" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00723/007237aaa5cb83c1c3876fdcd05b616b23334902" alt=""
boots no7 extreme length black mascara
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57646/57646092b4c5506750407da5ab4545f28c49dbc6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5827c/5827cdab195de5de88d8d27b35978de63dd50875" alt=""
100percent pure black tea mascara
So, as most of you know by now, I am weird about processed stuff and chemicals. Luckily, boots no7 and 100percent pure rank relatively low on the cosmetics safety database hazard scale. If you haven't been, you should... it's quite illuminating! Anywhooo... here are some pics to compare them. Keep in mind that 100percent pure is a hazard score of 2 on the 1-10 rating (low hazard) There is no rating for the boots no7 extreme length mascara. However, the boots no7 maximum volume mascara is listed as a rating of 3 (moderate hazard), so we can safely assume that it's within that moderate range (3-6).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc2d2/fc2d2ec6633df6d913ba2627b71e0c9e3dc93502" alt=""
My right eye (on your left) is boots no7, the left (on your right) is 100 percent pure
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a4bc/4a4bc28ede0237b856aeb192aa760535d2563446" alt=""
My right eye (on your left) is boots no7, the left (on your right) is 100 percent pure
Have any of you tried either of these mascaras? What do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment